The Advisor Trap: Stop Paying for Name-Dropping Rights
Why most startup advisors aren’t worth the cap table space.
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means" - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride (1987)
Three weeks ago, I reviewed a cap table that made me wince. A promising founder with strong early traction had given away 4% of his company to eight different "strategic advisors." When asked what measurable value these advisors had delivered, his answer revealed everything: "They're all really busy with other commitments right now, but having their names associated with us has been helpful for credibility..."
This needs to stop.
Startup culture has created many peculiar rituals, but few are as wasteful as the advisor merry-go-round. Equity is the oxygen of your company, not a thank you card or networking tool. Yet in boardrooms across the country, I hear the same dangerous suggestion: "We should bring them on as an advisor."
These six words have diluted more cap tables than almost any other early-stage mistake.
The Advisory Mirage
The fantasy is seductive: bring on the former Chief Something of a recognizable company, and suddenly doors will open. Their network becomes your network. Their wisdom becomes your strategic advantage.
Here's what actually happens: they show up for one kickoff call filled with generic platitudes. When you ask for a specific introduction, they promise to "connect you next week." After several follow-ups, you might get a forwarded template introduction that goes nowhere. Their consistent response to requests becomes "Crazy busy, let's catch up soon"—while they've already added your company to their LinkedIn profile.
Meanwhile, that "small" equity grant silently compounds with every funding round. A fintech founder I advised gave 0.5% to an industry "thought leader" who made exactly one introduction in two years. When the company exited for $40M, that single email was worth $200,000—roughly the same as what the engineering lead received after three years of 70-hour weeks.
The Real Cost of Fake Help
Beyond the obvious equity cost lies a more insidious problem: the illusion of progress. Having impressive names associated with your company may create a dangerous sense of validation but customers and product-market fit are utterly indifferent to your advisor slide.
Some advisors actively damage your company with outdated guidance. I watched a promising B2B startup waste six crucial months and nearly $800K following an advisor's enterprise sales playbook from 2010. By the time they course-corrected, they'd burned half their runway.
What Actually Works
Counterintuitively, the most valuable advisors are rarely the most famous ones. Often, they're the "failed" founders, those who ran similar companies that didn't make it. They have battle scars from every mistake you're about to make and no mythology to protect.
A truly valuable advisor consistently does at least one of three things:
Opens high-leverage doors—not casual introductions, but relationship-staking endorsements that convert to customers, capital, or crucial talent
Provides perspective that fundamentally changes your trajectory—insights that redirect your approach before you hit the iceberg
Shows up when it matters most—answering the Sunday night panic call when your largest customer threatens to churn or your round is falling apart
One enterprise software founder I work with has just one advisor—a former CTO who has never appeared on a pitch deck. This advisor reviews architecture decisions weekly, interviews key hires, and once spent an entire weekend helping recover from an infrastructure failure before a major client launch. That's an advisor worth equity.
The Accountability Framework
If you bring on advisors, approach it with disciplined rigor:
Start with small grants and significant cliffs. A structured arrangement with 0.1% tied to specific milestones beats 0.5% based on vague promises.
Define clear deliverables. "Strategic advice" isn't a deliverable. "Three qualified introductions to enterprise customers within 60 days" is.
Implement trial periods and quarterly value reviews. If they can't contribute meaningfully in 90 days, they never will.
Include termination provisions. Your documents should allow for advisor removal when the relationship isn't working.
Any advisor truly committed to your success will welcome accountability.
The Clean Exit Strategy
For non-performing advisors already on your cap table:
Document exactly what each has contributed in the past 6 months.
Hold a direct (albeit awkward) conversation: "We've valued your association, but our company needs active engagement right now. Can you commit to specific deliverables over the next quarter, or should we restructure our relationship?"
For those unwilling to step up, propose a reduced equity position that reflects actual contribution.
Remember: advisors who resist accountability are confirming exactly why they should have less of your company.
The Hidden Pattern
The advisors who demand the most equity often deliver the least value. The most valuable mentors rarely insist on formal advisor agreements or significant equity grants. They help because they genuinely believe in what you're building.
Conversely, those who negotiate aggressively for larger equity stakes upfront are frequently the ones who disappear when you actually need help. They're collecting advisory positions across dozens of startups, treating each as a lottery ticket rather than a commitment.
The Ruthless Reality
Early-stage companies don't need decorative advisors. They need survival. Every point of equity given to a non-contributing advisor is equity that could have attracted a critical engineer or incentivized a high-performing salesperson.
Your cap table is a permanent record of your judgment. Five years from now, when you're negotiating your exit, every name on that document will represent either a crucial contributor or a costly mistake.
Names don't build companies. Work does.
Reserve your equity for people who deliver real value.
Again another invaluable insight that flies in the face of the hot air in the Bay Area.
These offers of help come in many different guises.
I heard one tale of a semi-successful founder (the story was wrapped well to the outside world) offer to be a co-founder to a start up where they would take a large chunk of equity and offer some of their time.
Again another way to worm in and not really help in the way the founders really needed.
The timing for and the information in this post is incredibly helpful.
As a first time, solopreneur between Tokyo & LA, the constant advice I have received is at minimum, get advisors on board as soon as possible as Azabu Foods is growing quickly.
Much appreciated, Brian!